Matthew Brown Exposes How Whistleblowers Are Being Set Up
This episode of WEAPONIZED features a detailed follow-up conversation with whistleblower Matt Brown, who expands on his assertions about a classified UAP-related effort known as “Immaculate Constellation”
A man of indisputable character proves it again.
https://x.com/barnes_law/status/2033900582876987873
After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today.
I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.
It has been an honor serving under @POTUS
and @DNIGabbard
and leading the professionals at NCTC.
May God bless America.
https://x.com/joekent16jan19/status/2033897242986209689
#iran #joeKent #robertBarnes
If U.S. “boots on the ground” were inserted into Iranian territory, the response from the Iranian military would almost certainly be rapid, asymmetric, and multi-layered, rather than a conventional tank-on-tank war alone. Iran’s doctrine is built around making any invasion extremely costly and politically unsustainable.
Below are the most likely responses based on Iranian military strategy and past behavior.
Iran’s regular armed forces (Islamic Republic of Iran Army) and the elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) would likely attempt to engage invading forces quickly, especially near landing zones or border crossings.
Typical actions could include:
Artillery, missile, and drone strikes on U.S. troop positions
Ambushes and mobile warfare using terrain such as mountains and urban areas
Anti-armor and anti-air systems targeting vehicles and helicopters
Iran has spent decades preparing for a defensive war on its own territory, where geography favors defenders.
Even if U.S. forces achieved early tactical successes, Iran would likely transition to a long war of attrition.
The IRGC and its branch, the Basij, could mobilize large numbers of irregular fighters.
Tactics would likely include:
Urban insurgency
Improvised explosive devices (IEDs)
Hit-and-run attacks
Use of tunnels and fortified urban zones
This strategy is designed to prolong the conflict and increase casualties, making a foreign occupation politically difficult.
Iran’s strategy rarely stays confined to its own borders. The IRGC’s overseas arm, the Quds Force, has relationships with militias across the Middle East.
In a U.S.–Iran ground war, these groups could attack U.S. interests:
Hezbollah in Lebanon
Shiite militias in Iraq
Houthi forces in Yemen
Other regional networks
Targets could include:
U.S. bases
Embassies
Shipping routes
Regional allies of the United States
This spreads the conflict across the region.
Iran has a large missile arsenal and has demonstrated willingness to use it, such as during the 2020 Iranian missile strikes on U.S. bases in Iraq.
If U.S. troops entered Iran, Iran could:
Launch ballistic and cruise missiles at nearby U.S. bases
Conduct drone swarms
Strike logistics hubs in neighboring countries
Iran could also try to disrupt global energy supplies by threatening shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.
Possible tactics:
Naval mines
Fast-attack boats
Anti-ship missiles
Drone attacks on tankers
This could raise oil prices globally and increase international pressure to end the conflict.
Iran has developed significant cyber capabilities and might target:
U.S. infrastructure
financial systems
energy networks
military communications
Cyber attacks would likely accompany physical combat.
✅ Overall:
Iran’s likely strategy would not rely on defeating U.S. forces in conventional battle. Instead, it would aim to:
Inflict steady casualties
Expand the conflict regionally
Disrupt global markets
Prolong the war until political pressure forces a withdrawal
This approach is sometimes described by analysts as “layered asymmetric defense.”
'Americans don't TRUST Trump...': Chuck Schumer GRILLS POTUS over Iran war in fiery Senate speech - The Economic Times
US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Thursday accused President Donald Trump of lying about a report that said a US military investigation found American forces may be responsible for a deadly strike on a school in Iran. "As the war on Iran continues, Donald Trump does what he usually does. He lies. He's lying to the American people," Schumer said on the Senate floor. His remarks came a day after Trump told reporters that he did not know about the recent findings. A preliminary US military investigation concluded that American forces were responsible for a Feb. 28 strike on an Iranian elementary school, the New York Times reported Wednesday, citing US officials and others familiar with the findings. Schumer cited public reporting suggesting that preliminary intelligence assessments indicate US military operations may have been involved in "this horrible missile strike" on the all-girls Iranian elementary school, killing more than 170 victims. "When Donald Trump was asked about those reports, what did he say? He said, 'Well, I don't know about that.' "That's ridiculous, and it's an obvious lie," Schumer said.
Alfa Fia TankAdam Slavkovský
Photo – May 2024
Center on Conscience & War - Register now! If the war on Iran has caused you to have moral questions about your participation, you are not alone. [According to the activist, the soldier told his mother his unit would be going “boots on the ground” that night and claimed his commander said the operation was meant to bring about the second coming of Christ.]
#iran #conscientiousobjector #news #newsletter #antiwar
