Tuesday, October 6, 2020

Ex-OPCW chief Jose Bustani reads Syria testimony that US, UK blocked at UN

https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1313469123578429443

Aaron Maté @aaronjmate
"I see pro-war lobbyist @Charles_Lister’s latest attempt to discredit OPCW whistleblowers.

He omits that US & allies blocked Jose Bustani’s testimony at the UN, but shows him interviewed once on RT.

Here’s the Bustani testimony Lister wants to silence"

+++

https://thegrayzone.com/2020/10/05/ex-opcw-chief-jose-bustani-reads-syria-testimony-that-us-uk-blocked-at-un/

Ex #OPCW chief Jose #Bustani reads #Syria testimony that US, UK blocked at #UN

+++

https://youtu.be/ZgIDlgD_txM

At a UN Security Council meeting on Monday, October 5 2020, the US, UK, France and allies blocked the testimony of Jose Bustani, the first Director General of the OPCW.

The Grayzone has obtained Bustani’s prepared statement and is publishing it in full.

Bustani was invited to brief the Security Council on the OPCW’s cover-up of an investigation into an alleged chemical attack in #Douma, Syria in April 2018.

The US, UK, and France bombed Syria after accusing the Syrian government of dropping toxic gas in Douma.

OPCW inspectors later found evidence that undermined the official narrative, but were censored by their superiors under US pressure.

As the OPCW’s first Director General, Bustani experienced first-hand the costs of challenging pro-war narratives.

In 2002, he was personally threatened by John Bolton and ousted as OPCW chief after he facilitated inspections that stood in the way of the Bush administration’s drive to invade Iraq.

In his comments, Bustani voices support for the OPCW inspectors and urges the current Director General, Fernando #Arias, to let them air their suppressed evidence in a transparent manner.

“At great risk to themselves, [the inspectors] have dared to speak out against possible irregular behaviour in your Organisation, and it is without doubt in your, in the Organisation’s, and in the world’s interest that you hear them out,” Bustani says.

“Regardless of whether or not there is substance to the concerns raised about the OPCW’s behaviour in the Douma investigation, hearing what your own inspectors have to say would be an important first step in mending the Organisation’s damaged reputation.

The dissenting inspectors are not claiming to be right, but they do want to be given a fair hearing."

[It’s been one #FalseFlag after another. Please bear that in mind the next time these so-called purveyors of “intelligence” try to drag U.S. into another war.]

 

No comments:

Post a Comment