“However, when these test animals were exposed to the wild virus, most developed extreme symptoms of lung, and in some cases liver disease, with many dying”
“This serious reaction only became obvious following post-vaccination #challenge with the live virus”
+++
It is therefore fundamental for you and the various Australian health authorities, fully understand the historic issues that have accompanied all previous, but failed attempts, to develop and gain approval for coronavirus vaccines, as well as a number of other similar, viral based, communicable disease vaccines.
There are many mechanisms at play with the concerning negative responses to vaccines, but the two considered to be most relevant to COVID-19 have been termed pathogenic priming and enhanced immune responses (EIR).
During a number of SARS-CoV-1 (SARS) vaccine trials on test animals, where lung tissue was engineered to closely resembled human lung tissue (mice and then ferrets), the test subjects all accommodated the vaccine without significant adverse reactions, and also confirmed production of the appropriate antibodies.
However, when these test animals were exposed to the wild virus, most developed extreme symptoms of lung, and in some cases liver disease, with many dying (2, 3).
This disturbing pattern was later repeated with the Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS, also a coronavirus) vaccine studies (4).
Researchers believed a type of “priming” of the immune system was observed during these animal studies of SARS spike protein-based vaccines (viruses nearly identical to SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19), leading to increased morbidity and mortality in vaccinated animals when subsequently exposed to the wild virus.
This serious reaction only became obvious following post-vaccination challenge with the live virus, where the recombinant SARS spike-protein-based vaccines not only failed to provide protection from SARS-CoV-1 infection, but also the test animals experienced increased immunopathology with eosinophilic infiltrates in their lungs (5).
Similarly, further trials found that ferrets previously vaccinated against SARS-CoV-1 also developed strong inflammatory responses in liver tissue.
Both studies appear to have confirmed a cellular immune response, or pathogenic priming, allowing significant susceptibility to the actual pathogen due to an over-reaction by the immune system, described as EIR, or antigen-dependent enhancement (ADE), where antibodies created during a first-time infection to the body, even a vaccine, could end up enhancing virus entry into host cells.
The vaccine and the subsequent immune responses then triggered symptoms and outcomes on par or worse than naturally acquired disease, rather than protecting against a real infection (6).
The precise mechanism for these negative reactions is not fully understood and is disputed by experts, which actually makes the risk even greater.
Patrons of Chiropractic Science (PCS)
No comments:
Post a Comment