SARSCoV2 - “purposefully infecting vaccinated and non-vaccinated study groups with the virus (rather than waiting for natural infection) in ‘challenge trials’” - Animals s/b “purposefully” infected, not humans. DO NOT skip this step!

 

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/should-a-coronavirus-vaccine-be-compulsory-/

The ‘lack of prevalence’ reason is why some maverick scientists are entertaining the controversial idea of purposefully infecting vaccinated and non-vaccinated study groups with the virus (rather than waiting for natural infection) in ‘challenge trials’.

The idea is controversial because as well as posing an ethical problem, it poses a paradoxical problem.

The ethical problem is giving something to a person that is known to cause harm and for which there is no clear cure.

The paradoxical problem is that if scientists feel that young and healthy people can be safely infected with the virus then it undermines the rationale for having enforced lockdown upon the healthy population.

#SARSCoV2 #RFKJr

[“purposefully infecting vaccinated and non-vaccinated study groups with the virus (rather than waiting for natural infection) in ‘challenge trials’” - Animals s/b “purposefully” infected, not humans. DO NOT skip this step!]